Thursday, April 27, 2006
Lost Posting
Tongue Tied Freedom of Speech
New York Times Rituals of Grief Go Online
Dog and Cat Theology
Again, sorry.
Sunday, April 23, 2006
Deal or no Deal?
For instance, a contestant might be offered $30,000.00 if they decide to "Deal" with the banker and give up the briefcase they hold. Contestant chooses "No deal." Then several more of the briefcases are opened. Suppose the 1 million, 1/2 million, and 1/4 million are opened. The potential value of the contestant's briefcase drops significantly. The next offer might be $10,000. The opposite is also true. If the $0.01, $1.00, and $10.00 are opened, the potential value increases.
In theory the game can come down to only one briefcase being left to deal with. The only two values not ruled out are $0.01 and $1,000,000.00 (which in real life, the best option would be to take the $500,000.00 or so that the banker would offer). If one could be sure they chose the million dollar briefcase, they could afford to say no deal. But if they were wrong they would leave with only a penny.
OK. The point of this post was not to tell you about the gameshow, but to apply it to life. How many times do we take the things that God, creator of the universe, has given us, and play "Deal or No Deal" with them?
God does everything for His glory, yet we take that and try to make it our glory. We want our dealmaking to win out. We take the initial desire of wanting to give God praise and honor, but then trade it for something that can give us pleasure.
This is the equivalent of having the person who placed the values in the briefcases tell us exactly which one to pick - which we do - and then trading it away because... we think we can do a better deal than God.
Tuesday, April 18, 2006
Bible still allowed in Canada
The sunburn from Canyon Lake continues... as does the heat outside.
Sunday, April 16, 2006
Happy Resurrection Day!
I am a little sunburned from yesterday at Canyon Lake. But it was an excellent time.
Tuesday, April 11, 2006
Persecution Dream
I don't remember the details, but I awoke with the acute sense that I was being persecuted for my beliefs and that I was at peace about it. I have no clue if it is something that may happen in the future or whatnot. What I do know is that there are several Christians who are persecuted daily (yes even today) for what they believe -- and for the most part no one is aware that it occurs. Pray for those that are persecuted for their relationship with Jesus that they may not falter or deny His name. I do not pray that the persecution ends. Why? Because the Good News of Christ's Love and Redemption of us spreads faster when under duress than in comfort. Because I want all to hear about it -- not just those who live in a country where the freedom of religion is observed.
Global Night Commute
I have been, am now, and will continue to be critical of peace rallies, anti-war movements, and demonstrations in general. However, I am seriously considering participating in the Global Night Commute. While it does have partners with whom I do not always (more honestly, hardly ever) agree (Amnesty International being the one that jumped out at me), I am willing to give this one a shot and see how it goes. I want to see with my own eyes and talk with the people there what they think this will do.
One thing I am sure of, and no demonstration regardless of size will change it, is that the only way that Uganda will have peace is through the Prince of Peace. Only the love of God can successfully end war, especially one that has been raging for over 20 years. So why participate in a secular rally that may not make much of an impact?
Second, some awareness, however misplaced, is better than no awareness. (But I have to be careful with that reason, because sometimes doing the partially-right thing is more damaging than doing nothing)
Most importantly, I can share with the attendees (and my readers) the REAL way for the situation to be solved (not awareness of a cause, but a relationship with God).
Monday, April 10, 2006
Global Warming Stopped?
More Personal
I have been accused of, and to which I plead guilty, not including enough about "me" and "my life" in my blog. I'll try to do so in the future. Here's a start:
Last weekend, I went with a friend to the Poteet Strawberry Festival. It had more to do with a fair than a festival and more to do with rides and souvenirs than strawberries. But it was fun nevertheless. I did get some strawberry ice cream. Now if I can only find some fresh strawberries that aren't $30 a flat...
I'm looking forward to an upcoming waterskiing trip.
My main place for photos will still be http://spaces.msn.com/physics4christ/photos/ until I can find a better place online. Suggestions anyone?
Scary Ultra Right-Wing Governments
I recently saw "V for Vendetta." I didn't really like the movie. The first previews I saw for the movie looked pretty good (I was out of the country when i saw the previews), the premise of the movie seemed sound (Bad Government needs to be overthrown - "In the course of human events..."), and it starred Natalie Portman. (In the words of one of my friends, "she's quite a looker").
However, after reading Focus on the Family's review, I knew that it wasn't a good movie for enjoyment. So why did I still go watch it? National Review, among other newspapers/magazines, ran a critique of the movie because the hero (of sorts) was a terrorist. I wanted to see what kind of government the hero was to take on. Why would we make a hero out of a terrorist? What is the difference between a terrorist and a revolutionary?
The way I see it, a terrorist can never be a suitable hero. A terrorist is one who uses violence on civilians for political gain. A revolutionay uses violence on the established government for political gain. Clearly, George Washington and the other Founding Fathers used violence for political gain. However they did not target civilians - hence not being terrorists.
I disagree with Mr. Suderman that "V" is a terrorist. He does not explicitly target civillians, rather he goes after government leaders and buildings. Yet at the same time, I do not see him as a revolutionary, because he did not fight a defensive battle, but one of offense. This may be too fine of a line to destinguish, so, as always, I welcome debate on the issue. My initial position is that "V" is not a suitable hero but also not a terrorist.
The primary reason for my seeing the movie was to see what type of government was portrayed as evil. While I shall save my theory on the political spectrum to another time (I don't like the idea of a spectrum, but rather a wheel), the evil English government was a like the Westboro Baptists Church members became in charge. (See my blog entitled "Disgusting Choice for Utilizing Free Speech") Yet, in the movie, it appears that the movie makers made them equivalent with ALL Christians.
I find this to be a not-so-veiled attack on Christianity. The logical pattern being a form of a straw man fallacy:
This (very extreme right wing) is what a country would look like if we let the Christians be in charge. We don't want this to happen. Therefore we don't want any of them in charge.
I find the only way to refute this is to deal with the Big problem. The problem is that we have too many Christians walking around preaching ideas and not enough Christ-followers showing the love of God.
Sunday, April 09, 2006
For now
One day it will come,
When standing on the golden streets,
No longer will pauses be required,
No more getting tired,
But praise uninterrupted beats
To glorify the Son.
Yet before that time arrives
Pain and trouble in our lives
Shall be like fire finding dross
And peoples will spit upon the cross.
But for those that persevere
Through shed blood and tear,
For that day will surely come,
From every nation, tribe, and tongue
To those that worship, shout, and sing
Glorious praises to our King.
And ceaseless will it be,
For all the world to see.